Home / Overview

Overview

One integrated platform. Multiple safety capabilities.

Why connected awareness matters on the modern battlefield, what the platform brings together, and how it behaves in real situations.

01 · The operational challenge

Modern threats require connected awareness.

Multiple · Low · Fast-changing

Low-altitude drone threats

Small drones are hard to see and hear, fly low, and can change direction quickly. Awareness has to be continuous.

RiskLate warning

Separate · Partial · Delayed

Fragmented information

Sensors, tags and command staff may each hold part of the picture. Without integration, alerts arrive late or incomplete.

RiskDelayed, incomplete alerts

Friend or foe?

Identification risk

When personnel cannot be identified quickly and reliably, mistakes in who is friend and who is not become more likely.

RiskFriend / foe mistakes

02 · Executive overview

From independent devices to one connected system.

Today each device works on its own. The platform joins them into one shared operational picture.

01

Drone detection & awareness

Sensors observe the airspace; software detects, classifies and tracks aerial objects.

Proposed
02

Sensor & wearable integration

Sensor data and wearable-tag data, including fatigue indicators, feed one shared layer.

Proposed
03

Command intelligence & reporting

One interface shows alerts, personnel and wellbeing status, and a full event history.

Proposed
04

Soldier & weapon safety

A proposed hold interface for friendly-fire or altercation risk. Requires vendor approval.

To be validated
Drone detectionAerial objects detected and tracked
Sensor dataInputs fused into one stream
Soldier identificationWearable tags associate identity

Shared operational picture

Threats and friendly personnel on one command view

Command reportingAlerts, status and event history
Safety decision-makingHuman authorisation and safety interfaces

03 · Addressing friendly-fire risk

Why identification matters.

0soldiers killed in the period reported
0killed by friendly fire and other accidents
0of those were friendly-fire cases

Faster personnel identification, a shared operational picture and controlled safety processes may reduce some identification-related risks.

Source: IDF figures reported 12 Dec 2023 (Times of Israel; also Ynet, NBC News, JPost) covering the early ground operation. The figure counts friendly fire and other accidents. The proposed interface would not prevent every incident — causes include air strikes, tank fire, infantry fire and vehicle accidents.

04 · System scenarios

From detection to coordinated response.

Three illustrative workflows. Conceptual only — not operational procedures.

  1. Object observedSensors see an aerial object
  2. Data processedSensor data is fused
  3. Track + confidencePresented to the operator
  4. Operator decidesAn authorised person reviews
  5. Record + reportStatus logged for command
  1. Indicators readWearable sends status
  2. Fatigue flaggedCompared with baseline
  3. Commander alertedDuty manager notified
  4. Duty changedRest or swap, human decision
  5. Welfare recordRoster and log updated
  1. Risk cues seenFriendly fire or altercation
  2. Safety assessedCombined view of risk
  3. Hold requestedReversible request
  4. Authorised confirmVia an approved interface
  5. Event loggedReported to command
Next Technology →